Radiohead – almost right

I’m over the moon many different ways about the new Radiohead album. You’d have to have been living on the moon to miss the story, but just in case you have, it can be summarised like this: You buy and download the album direct from Radiohead’s web site, and name your own price. That can even be £0 if you like.

My copy cost £5.55, which seems pretty cheap for an album to me. The best part, however, is that exactly £5.55 goes to Radiohead, with no stinking record labels or pointless middlemen in between. (For the sticklers amongst you, I actually paid £6.00, with £0.45 being the credit card processing fee). I don’t know how much they would have received if the album had been released in the usual way, but I would guess around about a pound. I know we used to see, at best, about £1.50 from the sale of a £30 game.

I’m certainly not complaining about the album itself, but that was very unlikely to happen given that I love everything Radiohead do. The true test of that will be Mia though, who although also a big fan is too young at two years old to be as set in her ways as me. What am I moaning about then, with the “almost right”?

Hoops.

I had to jump through hoops, starting with navigating the bizzare web site, enabling javascript for two different domains, and finishing up with filling in my address, email address and even ‘my’ (hah) mobile number. It’s little wonder that despite that fact you can ‘buy it for free’, there are reports of substantial downloads via other channels. Frankly, there are very few bands I would have put up with that amount of messing about for, and I doubt I will do it again, so I would make the following suggestions for anyone (and let’s hope it’s everyone) following in Radiohead’s footsteps:

  • Make the download available directly, with no messing about. You don’t need my email address or mobile number. If I want to give you them though, let me do that seperately.
  • Get web developers with a clue. Nothing about navigating from page to page or filling in a form means you need to run Javascript on my machine.
  • Make it easy to pay, either before the download or after. I might feel guilty about my measly £5.55 this time next month and want to cough up some more, but I’m not keen on going through all that again. Make it easy – consider PayPal, consider a bank account I can just transfer into.
  • Bear in mind that I can undoubtedly download it quicker from somewhere else (e.g. a torrent) than I can from you. Maybe I can just copy the files from a friend. If I’ve done one of those things, I still want to pay you, so just let me do that. At the same time, you save the money on the bandwidth.

Other than the above, which are really minor quibbles, this is surely the way all music will be bought in future. Everybody’s happy except the middlemen who’ve been so determinedly destroying the music ‘industry’ for so long.

Oh, and a sidenote for Amazon because I’m still annoyed by this – by some accounts over a million people have managed to buy this album so far, without needing to install some software and agree to a draconian and offensive software license agreement.

  1. pwb’s avatar

    You make the same economic mistake that many do. What they make on one item doesn’t matter. It’s what they make in total. So if a label is able to move 5m CDs at 6.50 with 2.00 going to Radiohead (10m) vs Radiohead moving 1m at 5.00 (5m), Radiohead is losing out big time.

    Reply

  2. pwb’s avatar

    At least you mentioned how dismal the buying experience was.

    Reply

  3. hieu-dh.livejournal.com’s avatar

    Good idea about payment, I have only thought of the more accessible PayPal paying. After all the album isn’t “18 or older”, why do buyers need a credit card for buying?

    Also a more clueful web dev can run a tracker by themselves. If people can download it at £0.00 plus £0.45 goes to the banks (for nothing), Radiohead should cut back on the upload bill. I haven’t gotten past the credit card question though, so I’m speculating here.

    And websites that rely on images for all content simply suck.

    Reply

  4. CiaranG’s avatar

    >If people can download it at £0.00 plus £0.45 goes to the banks (for nothing)

    If you’re paying nothing, there’s no need for the credit card fee or indeed the credit card. Have you tried entering £0.00?

    @pwb: I’m not making an economic mistake, I just don’t share your belief that a record company would sell more units – in fact, I suggest it’s the other way around. Whether that’s a mistake or not remains to be seen. As for the buying experience, it’s only dismal compared to what it *could* be. Compared to any of the usual options it was fantastic.

    Reply

  5. Andrew Fenn’s avatar

    What happens if I put -6 pound? Do they then credit my account with 5.45? :D

    Reply

  6. hieu-dh.livejournal.com’s avatar

    My mistake, I left the boxes empty and it says “please enter something”, I put non-zeros in, so it went on to card info.

    £0.00 works as expected :)

    Reply

Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="" highlight="">