Baby 3.0

babytom

Introducing Baby 3.0. He’s called Tom. I’m still not getting involved in the very strange but apparently compulsory “how much did he weigh?” thing. I was going to mockingly suggest that our lovable NHS bureaucrats would have already ticked a little “overweight, prone to diabetes, and will probably die of a heart attack next week” box on their clipboard. No mocking is necessary though, because I put his details into their stupid calculator thing and sure enough, he is off the end of the scale, and “obese”. They are telling me he is at risk of cancer, and needs to eat less burgers and chips, and get more exercise. I guess we need to hope he drastically loses some weight by the time he’s four weeks old, but in my experience these babies just keep on getting bigger.

  1. kate’s avatar

    Haha, very funny! I have to say though people like to know the weight just out of interest as to how big they were when born. If it says so then I reckon it’s time to stop feeding the burgers and chips now! – and less of the fizzy drinks too! x x

    Reply

  2. Andy Turner’s avatar

    Well hello Tom. What a good name that is. I wonder about the difference between Child_2 and Baby 3.0, but I’m not asking really… As names go, both Child_2 and Baby 3.0 are okay with me, but Tom I like. Is Tom registered then, is it ‘official’, or are you going for a record on that front? Lots of love to you and all the family. Mr T

    Reply

Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="" highlight="">